Artikelaktionen
Zitierweise und Metadaten
Empfohlene Zitierweise
Michal Lynn Shumate: "Behind the Roman Monument". In archimaera#9 (2021). (urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52191)
Download Citation
Endnote
ļ»æ%0 Journal Article %T Behind the Roman Monument %A Shumate, Michal Lynn %J archimaera %D 2021 %V 2021 %N 9 %@ 1865-7001 %F shumate2021 %X The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of āliberatingā ancient monuments and pa- ving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical mon- uments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar āliberationā treatment within the cityscape, ācase medioevaliā and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruc- tion of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larg- er projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Romeās medieval do- mestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments. %L 720 %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52191Download
Bibtex
ļ»æ@Article{shumate2021,
author = "Shumate, Michal Lynn",
title = "Behind the Roman Monument",
journal = "archimaera",
year = "2021",
volume = "2021",
number = "9",
abstract = "The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of `liberating' ancient monuments and pa- ving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical mon- uments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar `liberation' treatment within the cityscape, ``case medioevali'' and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruc- tion of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larg- er projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Rome's medieval do- mestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments.",
issn = "1865-7001",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52191"
}
Download
RIS
ļ»æTY - JOUR AU - Shumate, Michal Lynn PY - 2021 DA - 2021// TI - Behind the Roman Monument JO - archimaera VL - 2021 IS - 9 AB - The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of āliberatingā ancient monuments and pa- ving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical mon- uments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar āliberationā treatment within the cityscape, ācase medioevaliā and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruc- tion of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larg- er projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Romeās medieval do- mestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments. SN - 1865-7001 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52191 ID - shumate2021 ER -Download
Wordbib
ļ»æ<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>shumate2021</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2021</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>archimaera</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>2021</b:Volume> <b:Issue>9</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52191</b:Url> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Shumate</b:Last><b:First>Michal Lynn</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Behind the Roman Monument</b:Title> <b:Comments>The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of āliberatingā ancient monuments and pa- ving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical mon- uments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar āliberationā treatment within the cityscape, ācase medioevaliā and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruc- tion of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larg- er projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Romeās medieval do- mestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
ļ»æPT Journal AU Shumate, M TI Behind the Roman Monument SO archimaera PY 2021 VL 2021 IS 9 AB The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of āliberatingā ancient monuments and pa- ving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical mon- uments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar āliberationā treatment within the cityscape, ācase medioevaliā and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruc- tion of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larg- er projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Romeās medieval do- mestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Behind the Roman Monument</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Shumate</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Michal Lynn</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of āliberatingā ancient monuments and pa- ving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical mon- uments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar āliberationā treatment within the cityscape, ācase medioevaliā and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruc- tion of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larg- er projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Romeās medieval do- mestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments.</abstract>
<subject />
<classification authority="ddc">720</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>archimaera</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>2021</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>9</number>
</detail>
<date>2021</date>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">1865-7001</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52191</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52191</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">shumate2021</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographisches Zitat | archimaera#9 (2021) |
|---|---|
| Titel |
Behind the Roman Monument (eng) |
| Autor | Michal Lynn Shumate |
| Sprache | eng |
| Zusammenfassung | The topography of Rome in the early twentieth-century is synonymous with looking straight forward, with the wholesale demolition of densely-packed neighborhoods at the service of āliberatingā ancient monuments and pa- ving wide new boulevards to connect them. In this narrative, Rome, both chronologically and geographically, is a series of modern and classical mon- uments clogged by interstitial rubble. While some medieval basilicas were given similar āliberationā treatment within the cityscape, ācase medioevaliā and their accretion of centuries of domestic space in the center of Rome were seen as visual and physical clutter to be cleared away, moved past, and forgotten. However, within these decades of bulldozing are a handful of case studies in the rear view, in the deliberate (if incidental) reconstruc- tion of medieval houses. Never monuments conserved in their own right, these case medievali were consistently completed at the margin of larg- er projects and often resulted in demi-monuments consolidated from the aforementioned rubble. This paper proposes a synchronic consideration of the process, of the demolition and reconstruction of Romeās medieval do- mestic landscape on the physical and cognitive margins (and often literal back side) of its modern and classical monuments. |
| Freie Schlagworte | |
| DDC | 720 |
| Rechte | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52191 |
