Zitierweise und Metadaten
Empfohlene Zitierweise
Sebastiano Fabbrini: "Against the Plan". In archimaera#9 (2021). (urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52189)
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Against the Plan %A Fabbrini, Sebastiano %J archimaera %D 2021 %V 2021 %N 9 %@ 1865-7001 %F fabbrini2021 %X European integration subverts our common understanding of “the rear view,” as it openly rejects planning or finality and, instead, unfolds as a gradual process, exploiting the spillovers and unintended consequences that occur when multiple states come together. The hypothesis of this study is that, within such fragmented system, walking in a straight line, having a goal and knowing where to go undermine the possibility of building. Con- versely, the buildings in the limelight result from a zigzag process, driven by contingency and informality. What is purposely designed as a front view tends to remain on paper due to a widespread concern for and distrust in the power of planning and, over time, that space is occupied by objects that respond to the logic of the rear view. The following analysis traces two case studies that illuminate how this tension played out in the early part of the integration process: on the one hand, a set of unplanned buildings that marked the spontaneous entrenchment of Brussels as the primary seat of the European institutions; on the other hand, a set of unbuilt plans for a single European capital on the Franco-German border. This is a unique op- portunity to explore how things get shaped and built within our complex, supranational system. %L 720 %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52189Download
Bibtex
@Article{fabbrini2021, author = "Fabbrini, Sebastiano", title = "Against the Plan", journal = "archimaera", year = "2021", volume = "2021", number = "9", abstract = "European integration subverts our common understanding of ``the rear view,'' as it openly rejects planning or finality and, instead, unfolds as a gradual process, exploiting the spillovers and unintended consequences that occur when multiple states come together. The hypothesis of this study is that, within such fragmented system, walking in a straight line, having a goal and knowing where to go undermine the possibility of building. Con- versely, the buildings in the limelight result from a zigzag process, driven by contingency and informality. What is purposely designed as a front view tends to remain on paper due to a widespread concern for and distrust in the power of planning and, over time, that space is occupied by objects that respond to the logic of the rear view. The following analysis traces two case studies that illuminate how this tension played out in the early part of the integration process: on the one hand, a set of unplanned buildings that marked the spontaneous entrenchment of Brussels as the primary seat of the European institutions; on the other hand, a set of unbuilt plans for a single European capital on the Franco-German border. This is a unique op- portunity to explore how things get shaped and built within our complex, supranational system.", issn = "1865-7001", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52189" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Fabbrini, Sebastiano PY - 2021 DA - 2021// TI - Against the Plan JO - archimaera VL - 2021 IS - 9 AB - European integration subverts our common understanding of “the rear view,” as it openly rejects planning or finality and, instead, unfolds as a gradual process, exploiting the spillovers and unintended consequences that occur when multiple states come together. The hypothesis of this study is that, within such fragmented system, walking in a straight line, having a goal and knowing where to go undermine the possibility of building. Con- versely, the buildings in the limelight result from a zigzag process, driven by contingency and informality. What is purposely designed as a front view tends to remain on paper due to a widespread concern for and distrust in the power of planning and, over time, that space is occupied by objects that respond to the logic of the rear view. The following analysis traces two case studies that illuminate how this tension played out in the early part of the integration process: on the one hand, a set of unplanned buildings that marked the spontaneous entrenchment of Brussels as the primary seat of the European institutions; on the other hand, a set of unbuilt plans for a single European capital on the Franco-German border. This is a unique op- portunity to explore how things get shaped and built within our complex, supranational system. SN - 1865-7001 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52189 ID - fabbrini2021 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>fabbrini2021</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2021</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>archimaera</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>2021</b:Volume> <b:Issue>9</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52189</b:Url> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Fabbrini</b:Last><b:First>Sebastiano</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Against the Plan</b:Title> <b:Comments>European integration subverts our common understanding of “the rear view,” as it openly rejects planning or finality and, instead, unfolds as a gradual process, exploiting the spillovers and unintended consequences that occur when multiple states come together. The hypothesis of this study is that, within such fragmented system, walking in a straight line, having a goal and knowing where to go undermine the possibility of building. Con- versely, the buildings in the limelight result from a zigzag process, driven by contingency and informality. What is purposely designed as a front view tends to remain on paper due to a widespread concern for and distrust in the power of planning and, over time, that space is occupied by objects that respond to the logic of the rear view. The following analysis traces two case studies that illuminate how this tension played out in the early part of the integration process: on the one hand, a set of unplanned buildings that marked the spontaneous entrenchment of Brussels as the primary seat of the European institutions; on the other hand, a set of unbuilt plans for a single European capital on the Franco-German border. This is a unique op- portunity to explore how things get shaped and built within our complex, supranational system.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Fabbrini, S TI Against the Plan SO archimaera PY 2021 VL 2021 IS 9 AB European integration subverts our common understanding of “the rear view,” as it openly rejects planning or finality and, instead, unfolds as a gradual process, exploiting the spillovers and unintended consequences that occur when multiple states come together. The hypothesis of this study is that, within such fragmented system, walking in a straight line, having a goal and knowing where to go undermine the possibility of building. Con- versely, the buildings in the limelight result from a zigzag process, driven by contingency and informality. What is purposely designed as a front view tends to remain on paper due to a widespread concern for and distrust in the power of planning and, over time, that space is occupied by objects that respond to the logic of the rear view. The following analysis traces two case studies that illuminate how this tension played out in the early part of the integration process: on the one hand, a set of unplanned buildings that marked the spontaneous entrenchment of Brussels as the primary seat of the European institutions; on the other hand, a set of unbuilt plans for a single European capital on the Franco-German border. This is a unique op- portunity to explore how things get shaped and built within our complex, supranational system. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Against the Plan</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Fabbrini</namePart> <namePart type="given">Sebastiano</namePart> </name> <abstract>European integration subverts our common understanding of “the rear view,” as it openly rejects planning or finality and, instead, unfolds as a gradual process, exploiting the spillovers and unintended consequences that occur when multiple states come together. The hypothesis of this study is that, within such fragmented system, walking in a straight line, having a goal and knowing where to go undermine the possibility of building. Con- versely, the buildings in the limelight result from a zigzag process, driven by contingency and informality. What is purposely designed as a front view tends to remain on paper due to a widespread concern for and distrust in the power of planning and, over time, that space is occupied by objects that respond to the logic of the rear view. The following analysis traces two case studies that illuminate how this tension played out in the early part of the integration process: on the one hand, a set of unplanned buildings that marked the spontaneous entrenchment of Brussels as the primary seat of the European institutions; on the other hand, a set of unbuilt plans for a single European capital on the Franco-German border. This is a unique op- portunity to explore how things get shaped and built within our complex, supranational system.</abstract> <subject /> <classification authority="ddc">720</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>archimaera</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>2021</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>9</number> </detail> <date>2021</date> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">1865-7001</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52189</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52189</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">fabbrini2021</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographisches Zitat | archimaera#9 (2021) |
---|---|
Titel |
Against the Plan (ger) |
Autor | Sebastiano Fabbrini |
Sprache | ger |
Zusammenfassung | European integration subverts our common understanding of “the rear view,” as it openly rejects planning or finality and, instead, unfolds as a gradual process, exploiting the spillovers and unintended consequences that occur when multiple states come together. The hypothesis of this study is that, within such fragmented system, walking in a straight line, having a goal and knowing where to go undermine the possibility of building. Con- versely, the buildings in the limelight result from a zigzag process, driven by contingency and informality. What is purposely designed as a front view tends to remain on paper due to a widespread concern for and distrust in the power of planning and, over time, that space is occupied by objects that respond to the logic of the rear view. The following analysis traces two case studies that illuminate how this tension played out in the early part of the integration process: on the one hand, a set of unplanned buildings that marked the spontaneous entrenchment of Brussels as the primary seat of the European institutions; on the other hand, a set of unbuilt plans for a single European capital on the Franco-German border. This is a unique op- portunity to explore how things get shaped and built within our complex, supranational system. |
Freie Schlagworte | |
DDC | 720 |
Rechte | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-21-52189 |