Zitierweise und Metadaten
Empfohlene Zitierweise
Paul Meurs, Marie-Thérèse van Thoor: "The transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam". In archimaera#006 (2015). (urn:nbn:de:0009-21-42544)
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T The transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam %A Meurs, Paul %A van Thoor, Marie-Thérèse %J archimaera %D 2015 %V einfügen %N 006 %@ 1865-7001 %F meurs2015 %X This article focuses on the design process for the transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (1885, by P.J.H. Cuypers), with special attention for the evolution of the design by Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos and the associated history of ideas. How did opinions on the intervention evolve from the concept for a masterplan in 1996 to the realized project? To what extent were all those diverse ambitions regarding the city, the monument and the museum realized? What was the role of the designers, not only referring to Cruz y Ortiz, but also to Van Hoogevest Architecten (restoration) and Wilmotte & Associés (interior)? How did the design evolve in a complex and ambitious context involving a great many interested parties, and what effect did this have on the design process from the first sketches to the ultimately realized renovation? %L 720 %K Amsterdam %K Chief Government Architect %K Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos %K Foundation Restoration Studio Limburg (SRAL) %K Gallery of Honour %K Gesamtkunstwerk %K Government Buildings Agency (RgD) %K Ministry of Education, Culture and Science %K Night Watch Gallery %K P.J.H. Cuypers %K Rijksmuseum %K Rijksmuseum Amsterdam %K Van Hoogevest Architecten %K Wilmotte & Associés %K bicycle route %K building archeological research %K colours %K courtyards %K intervention %K passageway %K reconstruction %K restoration %K restoration criteria %K transformation %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-42544Download
Bibtex
@Article{meurs2015, author = "Meurs, Paul and van Thoor, Marie-Th{\'e}r{\`e}se", title = "The transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam", journal = "archimaera", year = "2015", volume = "einf{\"u}gen", number = "006", keywords = "Amsterdam; Chief Government Architect; Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos; Foundation Restoration Studio Limburg (SRAL); Gallery of Honour; Gesamtkunstwerk; Government Buildings Agency (RgD); Ministry of Education, Culture and Science; Night Watch Gallery; P.J.H. Cuypers; Rijksmuseum; Rijksmuseum Amsterdam; Van Hoogevest Architecten; Wilmotte {\&} Associ{\'e}s; bicycle route; building archeological research; colours; courtyards; intervention; passageway; reconstruction; restoration; restoration criteria; transformation", abstract = "This article focuses on the design process for the transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (1885, by P.J.H. Cuypers), with special attention for the evolution of the design by Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos and the associated history of ideas. How did opinions on the intervention evolve from the concept for a masterplan in 1996 to the realized project? To what extent were all those diverse ambitions regarding the city, the monument and the museum realized? What was the role of the designers, not only referring to Cruz y Ortiz, but also to Van Hoogevest Architecten (restoration) and Wilmotte {\&} Associ{\'e}s (interior)? How did the design evolve in a complex and ambitious context involving a great many interested parties, and what effect did this have on the design process from the first sketches to the ultimately realized renovation?", issn = "1865-7001", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-42544" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Meurs, Paul AU - van Thoor, Marie-Thérèse PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - The transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam JO - archimaera VL - einfügen IS - 006 KW - Amsterdam KW - Chief Government Architect KW - Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos KW - Foundation Restoration Studio Limburg (SRAL) KW - Gallery of Honour KW - Gesamtkunstwerk KW - Government Buildings Agency (RgD) KW - Ministry of Education, Culture and Science KW - Night Watch Gallery KW - P.J.H. Cuypers KW - Rijksmuseum KW - Rijksmuseum Amsterdam KW - Van Hoogevest Architecten KW - Wilmotte & Associés KW - bicycle route KW - building archeological research KW - colours KW - courtyards KW - intervention KW - passageway KW - reconstruction KW - restoration KW - restoration criteria KW - transformation AB - This article focuses on the design process for the transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (1885, by P.J.H. Cuypers), with special attention for the evolution of the design by Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos and the associated history of ideas. How did opinions on the intervention evolve from the concept for a masterplan in 1996 to the realized project? To what extent were all those diverse ambitions regarding the city, the monument and the museum realized? What was the role of the designers, not only referring to Cruz y Ortiz, but also to Van Hoogevest Architecten (restoration) and Wilmotte & Associés (interior)? How did the design evolve in a complex and ambitious context involving a great many interested parties, and what effect did this have on the design process from the first sketches to the ultimately realized renovation? SN - 1865-7001 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-42544 ID - meurs2015 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>meurs2015</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2015</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>archimaera</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>einfügen</b:Volume> <b:Issue>006</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-42544</b:Url> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Meurs</b:Last><b:First>Paul</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>van Thoor</b:Last><b:First>Marie-Thérèse</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>The transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam</b:Title> <b:Comments>This article focuses on the design process for the transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (1885, by P.J.H. Cuypers), with special attention for the evolution of the design by Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos and the associated history of ideas. How did opinions on the intervention evolve from the concept for a masterplan in 1996 to the realized project? To what extent were all those diverse ambitions regarding the city, the monument and the museum realized? What was the role of the designers, not only referring to Cruz y Ortiz, but also to Van Hoogevest Architecten (restoration) and Wilmotte & Associés (interior)? How did the design evolve in a complex and ambitious context involving a great many interested parties, and what effect did this have on the design process from the first sketches to the ultimately realized renovation?</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Meurs, P van Thoor, M TI The transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam SO archimaera PY 2015 VL einfügen IS 006 DE Amsterdam; Chief Government Architect; Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos; Foundation Restoration Studio Limburg (SRAL); Gallery of Honour; Gesamtkunstwerk; Government Buildings Agency (RgD); Ministry of Education, Culture and Science; Night Watch Gallery; P.J.H. Cuypers; Rijksmuseum; Rijksmuseum Amsterdam; Van Hoogevest Architecten; Wilmotte & Associés; bicycle route; building archeological research; colours; courtyards; intervention; passageway; reconstruction; restoration; restoration criteria; transformation AB This article focuses on the design process for the transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (1885, by P.J.H. Cuypers), with special attention for the evolution of the design by Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos and the associated history of ideas. How did opinions on the intervention evolve from the concept for a masterplan in 1996 to the realized project? To what extent were all those diverse ambitions regarding the city, the monument and the museum realized? What was the role of the designers, not only referring to Cruz y Ortiz, but also to Van Hoogevest Architecten (restoration) and Wilmotte & Associés (interior)? How did the design evolve in a complex and ambitious context involving a great many interested parties, and what effect did this have on the design process from the first sketches to the ultimately realized renovation? ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>The transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Meurs</namePart> <namePart type="given">Paul</namePart> </name> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">van Thoor</namePart> <namePart type="given">Marie-Thérèse</namePart> </name> <abstract>This article focuses on the design process for the transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (1885, by P.J.H. Cuypers), with special attention for the evolution of the design by Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos and the associated history of ideas. How did opinions on the intervention evolve from the concept for a masterplan in 1996 to the realized project? To what extent were all those diverse ambitions regarding the city, the monument and the museum realized? What was the role of the designers, not only referring to Cruz y Ortiz, but also to Van Hoogevest Architecten (restoration) and Wilmotte & Associés (interior)? How did the design evolve in a complex and ambitious context involving a great many interested parties, and what effect did this have on the design process from the first sketches to the ultimately realized renovation?</abstract> <subject> <topic>Amsterdam</topic> <topic>Chief Government Architect</topic> <topic>Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos</topic> <topic>Foundation Restoration Studio Limburg (SRAL)</topic> <topic>Gallery of Honour</topic> <topic>Gesamtkunstwerk</topic> <topic>Government Buildings Agency (RgD)</topic> <topic>Ministry of Education, Culture and Science</topic> <topic>Night Watch Gallery</topic> <topic>P.J.H. Cuypers</topic> <topic>Rijksmuseum</topic> <topic>Rijksmuseum Amsterdam</topic> <topic>Van Hoogevest Architecten</topic> <topic>Wilmotte & Associés</topic> <topic>bicycle route</topic> <topic>building archeological research</topic> <topic>colours</topic> <topic>courtyards</topic> <topic>intervention</topic> <topic>passageway</topic> <topic>reconstruction</topic> <topic>restoration</topic> <topic>restoration criteria</topic> <topic>transformation</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">720</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>archimaera</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>einfügen</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>006</number> </detail> <date>2015</date> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">1865-7001</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-21-42544</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-21-42544</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">meurs2015</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographisches Zitat | archimaera#006 (2015) |
---|---|
Titel |
The transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (eng) |
Autor | Paul Meurs, Marie-Thérèse van Thoor |
Sprache | eng |
Zusammenfassung | This article focuses on the design process for the transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (1885, by P.J.H. Cuypers), with special attention for the evolution of the design by Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos and the associated history of ideas. How did opinions on the intervention evolve from the concept for a masterplan in 1996 to the realized project? To what extent were all those diverse ambitions regarding the city, the monument and the museum realized? What was the role of the designers, not only referring to Cruz y Ortiz, but also to Van Hoogevest Architecten (restoration) and Wilmotte & Associés (interior)? How did the design evolve in a complex and ambitious context involving a great many interested parties, and what effect did this have on the design process from the first sketches to the ultimately realized renovation? |
Freie Schlagworte | Amsterdam, Chief Government Architect, Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos, Foundation Restoration Studio Limburg (SRAL), Gallery of Honour, Gesamtkunstwerk, Government Buildings Agency (RgD), Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, Night Watch Gallery, P.J.H. Cuypers, Rijksmuseum, Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, Van Hoogevest Architecten, Wilmotte & Associés, bicycle route, building archeological research, colours, courtyards, intervention, passageway, reconstruction, restoration, restoration criteria, transformation |
DDC | 720 |
Rechte | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-21-42544 |
erstellt von Paul Meurs
zuletzt verändert:
18.11.2019 14:20
Mitwirkende: Meurs, Paul, van Thoor, Marie-Thérèse
DPPL